Indirect Procedures by Pedro de Alcantara.
What Every Musician Needs to Know about the Body – The Practical Application of Body Mapping and the Alexander Technique to Making Music by Barbara Conable.
Mind, Muscle and Music by Elizabeth Langford.
Integrated Practice by Pedro de Alcantara.
The Alexander Technique for Musicians by Judith Kleinman and Peter Buckoke.
‘Posture, tension and technique’ by Niso Ticciati; an introductory to the Technique which was first published in 1953 by the Re-education Centre (Isobel Cripps centre) as Niso Ticciati at that point was a pupil of Charles Neil and/or Eric de Peyer.
‘The organization of awareness’ by Frank Pierce Jones argues that the Alexander Technique is a method for organising awareness so that a performance can be well-learned without becoming stereotyped.
‘Awareness, freedom and muscular control’ by Frank Pierce Jones discusses a typical case of misdirected energy where a musician develops over-relaxed hands and arms at the expense of excessive tension around the spine.
‘Working with musicians’ by Vivien Mackie; making some observations on teaching the Technique to performers, on helping performers beyond ‘posture-as-such’.
‘Playing in a symphony’ by Evangeline Benedetti; the author has been a member of the New York Philharmonic cello section since 1967, qualifying as a teacher of the Technique in 1991, and reports of her experiences.
‘How to play Beethoven’ by Mark McGee; on discovering that his desire to shape music according to his own beliefs about the music amounted to an interference which produced forced and unnatural playing.
‘Conceptions and misconceptions’ by Nelly Ben-Or; on what to realistically expect – and not expect – for a musician from the Technique.
‘The relevance of the Alexander Technique for musicians under stress’ by Debrah de Graaff; a professional clarinet player discusses her experiences of playing with less tension.
‘Surprises in the music class’ by Vivien Mackie discusses working with singers, and the ‘holding habit’ in musicians.
‘The value of the Alexander Technique’ by Patrick Maddams; the Managing Director of the Royal Academy of Music on the importance of the Alexander Technique for musicians.
‘Working to principle’ by Pedro de Alcantara; on the importance of praticising with one’s whole body.
‘Some thoughts on practicing’ by Alex Farkas; on transferring what is learned in the Alexander Technique lesson to the student’s practice session.
‘A warm up for musicians’ by Ilana Machover presents some basic ideas behind her constructive warm-up for musicians.
‘Thoughts on musicians and the Alexander Technique’ by Elizabeth Langford on her experiences of teaching musicians.
‘“An open and shut case”’ by Alun Thomas stresses the importance of the quality of preparation for playing from a musician’s perspective.
‘Anti-technique – Can we learn without exercises, or how can we approach technique using F. M. Alexander’s principles?’ by Alex Farkas, with additional report by Cat Jary, challenges the assumptions that exercises are necessary for the physical means to perform adequately, and the task is something to endure.
‘The use of mime in instrumental learning and teaching with reference to the work of Kato Havas’ by Janet Pinder-Emery explores ideas taken from the teaching of Kato Havas, author of A New Approach to Violin Playing, using mime.
‘Inspiring musical performance’ by Ethan Kind discusses five aspects of playing: Alexander Technique posture, trusting yourself, troubleshooting, breathing, and playing as a gift.
‘A workshop for and about musicians’ by Evangeline Benedetti; on hearing the music you want to play as an aural image (pre-hearing), and on using the squat-sit as a preparation for sitting.
Autobiographical case history
‘Mastering a process can help musicians learn the Alexander Technique’ by Lorin Chisholm.
‘The use of conscious inhibition in the work of a performing artist’ by Maret Mursa Tormis
A study in which three musicians and three actors were tested three times over a period of two years (2006–08), before and after 20 Alexander Technique lessons, and then after a further period of six months. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were used to measure changes, and all measurements showed an improvement in performance.
‘Tension release in piano playing: Teaching Alexander Technique to undergraduate piano majors’ by Loo Fung Ying, et al.
Fifteen volunteer piano major undergraduate students were selected participants after a pretest score identified problems of tension. The participants identified tension in certain areas (fingers, hands, arms, wrists, shoulders, back, legs, and neck) before and after Alexander Technique training in a group class where each session lasted three hour, once per week over fourteen weeks. A one-to-one session of ten minutes was given to each participant while others observed. After a fourteen-week intervention of the Alexander Technique, the outcome reveals a positive effect in reducing tension in pianist.
‘The Alexander Technique and musicians: A systematic review of controlled trials’ by Sabine D. Klein, et al.
12 studies were included for further analysis, 5 of which were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 5 controlled but not randomised (CTs), and 2 mixed methods studies. Main outcome measures in RCTs and CTs were music performance, respiratory function, performance anxiety, body use and posture. Music performance was judged by external experts and found to be improved by AT in 1 of 3 RCTs; in 1 RCT comparing neurofeedback (NF) to AT, only NF caused improvements. Respiratory function was investigated in 2 RCTs, but not improved by AT training. Performance anxiety was mostly assessed by questionnaires and decreased by AT in 2 of 2 RCTs and in 2 of 2 CTs. Conclusions: A variety of outcome measures has been used to investigate the effectiveness of AT sessions in musicians. Evidence from RCTs and CTs suggests that AT sessions may improve performance anxiety in musicians. Effects on music performance, respiratory function and posture yet remain inconclusive.
‘Effect of the Alexander Technique on muscle activation, movement kinematics, and performance quality in collegiate violinists and violists: A pilot feasibility study’ by R. C. Wolf, et al.
This pilot feasibility study was designed to determine if muscle activation, movement kinematics, musical performance, and qualitative self-assessment over the course of a 10- week Alexander Technique (AT) intervention are viable means to assess the efficacy of AT in violinists/ violists. Two groups of collegiate violinists and violists participated: Group A (n=4) participated in weekly 1-hour group AT lessons and kept a personal journal of their progress. Group B (n=3) received no AT lessons. Pre- and post tests included muscle activation recorded using electromyography (EMG) and movement kinematics recorded via motion tracking as musicians played a scale and a Kreutzer étude. Performance was also video-recorded and evaluated by an expert for quality and kinesthetic awareness. The results suggest that the measures and intervention employed could, with some adaptation, be a viable means of determining the potential benefits of AT training.
‘The effect of lessons in the AlexanderTechnique on music performance in high and low stress situations’ by Elizabeth R. Valentine, et al.
25 music students were randomly assigned either to an experimental group who received a course of 15 lessons in the Alexander Technique, or to a control. A variety of measures were taken on four occasions: in both high and low stress situations before and after treatment. The experimental group showed improvement relative to the control on the following measures: overall music and technical quality as judged by independent experts blind to subjects’ condition assignment, heart rate variance, self-rated anxiety and positive attitude to performance. However, with the exception of heart rate variance, these effects were restricted to performance in the low stress class situations. There were no significant effects on height, peak flow or misuse as judged on the basis of video recordings of behaviour by independent experts in the Alexander Technique.
‘Postural homeostasis’ by Wilfred Barlow
A study with 50 students from a ‘London Voice and Drama College’ who had an average 37 half-hour lessons in the Alexander Technique over a period of 2–3 months. Progress was assessed on 20 subjects by means of Sheldon photography from which it was concluded that ‘marked differences occurred in the subjects without employing physical exercises’. In addition the two professors in charge of the students at the College prepared a progress report where they stated: 1. in all subjects there was a marked physical improvement, which was usually reflected vocally and dramatically; 2. all subjects became easier to teach; 3. eight of the subjects entered a singing competition where the total entry was over 100. Six of the eight students reached the semi-final, in which there were 15 semi-finalists.
‘Voice production as a function of head balance in singers’ by F. P. Jones
A single-subject study: a sound spectroscopy (a voice print) was made of a young woman singing, in an ‘habitual’ head-neck position and in an ‘adjusted’ head-neck position. The ‘adjusted’ head-neck position showed an improvement in the richness of the overtones and the almost disappearance of breathing sounds.